Jockey/Trainer News - 2017

Re: Jockey/Trainer News - 2017

Postby Sparrow Castle » Mon Jan 01, 2018 10:29 pm

Catalina wrote:
BaroqueAgain1 wrote:IIRC, Ellis is not claiming "that he didn't do anything wrong." He has acknowledged the drug overage, explained how it happened and taken responsibility for his decision.
IMHO, however, I supported his suggestion to remove ONE DAY from his suspension, while adding a year of probation, so that his stable didn't have to disband...and his stable hands weren't suddenly all out of work.
If TVG allows him to work from the studio, they might be showing support for that. Not for illegal med use.


Let's see if I recall this right: You are not supposed to race a horse on steroids because it enhances performance. Nor are you supposed to work a horse that is on steroids, because it encourages steroid-induced muscle growth.

I've taken some time to express below why I feel the way I do about situations like this one. Feel free to offer counter-arguments if you think I got any facts wrong, there's a lot of hearsay going around. I'm okay with nobody changing their minds based on what I think and write. To me, this is just another example of why I feel strongly that medication reform is very much needed in this sport.

There’s seems to be some confusion about CHRB regulations and BC regulations. I admit I have some sympathy for Ron Ellis because, in this current racing environment, I think any of us racing fools could find ourselves in similar situations.

At the time of this infraction in 2016, CHRB allowed horses to be treated with anabolic steroids as long as they go on the vet list and not race for 60 days after it was administered. CHRB regs also prohibit horses from testing positive for ANY amount of anabolic steroid.

The first reg was inconsistent with the NUMP/ARCI model rule at the time, which was NOT completely adopted by the CHRB. The ARCI model rule required a horse to not race for 60 days, but also have a negative drug test to ensure the substance was no longer in the horse’s system. This inconsistency, I think, caught the BC off guard and embarrassed both of these racing bodies. I think they were also embarrassed that the state vet knew about the prior positive and didn’t inform the BC.

After this incident, ARCI updated its model rule “to require a horse who receives an anabolic steroid treatment to sit out of racing for at least six months.” But remember, states are not forced to adopt ARCI rules, some tweak the model rule (as CHRB did in this case) and others don’t adopt the rules at all. Even when there’s agreement to adopt rules, that can take a very long time. The BC recently adopted the new ARCI rule to avoid the inconsistencies among state regulators, but now we have yet another racing body adding their own version of inconsistent racing regs.

Most experts agree that the picograms found in Masochistic was not enough to affect performance on race day. These tests have gotten so sensitive that they are even picking up trace amounts of caffeine, antihistamines, and any other drug that may be present in a horse’s contaminated environment. Racing does not do a good job making judgements that distinguish between environmental contamination and drugs directly administered to the horses, but that wasn’t the issue in this case. Ellis fully admitted he administered the drug and when. He tried only to negotiate a settlement that would preserve his livelihood and the jobs of his stable staff.

There are legitimate therapeutic benefits to using anabolic steroids. It can be a life-saving treatment in cases of some diseases that cause wasting. It’s well-known that anabolic steroids help a horse recover from exercise, improve appetite, and build muscle mass. Masochistic seems like a “hard keeper” who benefited from its use during breaks between races, and that was perfectly legal under CHRB regs at the time which in turn wasn’t an issue under BC rules at the time. The only issue was that it wasn't long enough after treatment to completely leave the horse’s system and he tested positive post-race for trace amounts.

CHRB issues guidelines for medication withdrawal times. For anabolic steroids, the guideline is 60 days. I think Masochistic’s race day positive was 67 days after treatment. Obviously, there is a wide disparity between horses in how they metabolize these substances, which is another problem these rules create for trainers and owners when they are written as zero positive, that is NO trace of this drug can be found in post-race tests whether or not that trace amount can affect race-day performance.

Ron Ellis is by far not the only trainer who sees the therapeutic value of anabolic steroids and uses it when he thinks it can be beneficial. Masochistic was put on the CHRB vet list each time, again following the rules in place at the time, and the vet list is very public, not hidden from bettors or anyone else. It is published on the CHRB website, anabolic steroids is categorized under “medication”: http://www.chrb.ca.gov/misc_docs/VetList.pdf. And, yes, this drug like many others can be and is abused. And the “golden boys” large-stable trainers use it too.

There was no prohibition that I know of that kept horses who were on the CHRB vet list from training. Masochistic did have published workouts during the time he was on the vet list: http://www.equibase.com/profiles/workouts.cfm?refno=8870434&registry=T. I’ve heard no outcry from CHRB or BC that this too was in violation.

The backsides of race tracks have ears and tongues, and news travels fast (remember, before the Internet, this was our main means of spreading news quickly). Believe me this situation was discussed widely inside barn walls. Ron Ellis is known as an ethical and honest horseman, not a frequent user of hard core drugs. He competes is a high-profile circuit and tries to do right by his horses and owners. I am fairly sure that his decision to take a risk and race Masochistic under these circumstances would have been discussed with his owners, at least one of which is a big user of Twitter. I don’t remember any Tweets from her expressing outrage at this decision to race.

I also recall hearing (either from racing pubs or backside chatter, not sure) that Dr. Arthur did not tell Ron about the Positive test for several days after he knew about it and, when he did tell Ellis, it was three days before the race. Ellis tried to get a more current test run then, but he could not find a testing lab willing or able to do such a quick turnaround. Yes, he took a risk and he lost big time here. I and many others think the punishment in this case does not fit the crime.

So, the status quo may be acceptable to some folks but, I think there are too many good guys who try to play by the rules and actually make a living in this sport and get burnt by it. Ron Ellis is known to many people as one of the good guys. I can’t support seeing people like him crucified when they make a mistake or misjudgment under rules and regulations that are ambiguous and inconsistent. There are other good guys caught up in situations that seem terribly unreasonable when you look through the eyes of other horsepeople. Just look up Graham Motion who has been caught in a “trace amount” situation from 2015 in Kentucky. Motion wasn’t even allowed to present evidence to support his case during the appeals phase. The case has since snowballed like crazy and, besides due process, involves the “absolute insurer” rule. http://www.drf.com/news/motion-ruling-could-impact-absolute-insurer-statute

What’s the solution? Here’s one from the Jockey Club website:
Since its inception more than a decade ago, the Racing Medication and Testing Consortium (RMTC) has worked to develop and promote uniform rules and testing standards at the national level, which culminated in the creation of the National Uniform Medication Program (NUMP) in 2012. A review of the rules of pari-mutuel racing conducted between July 19 and November 16, 2017, shows that not one of the major racing jurisdictions has adopted NUMP in its entirety.

http://www.jockeyclub.com/Default.asp?section=Resources&area=10&story=1021

Component 4 - Adoption of the current version of the ARCI Penalty Guidelines for Multiple Medication Violations (MMV) by state racing commissions - has been fully adopted in the most current version by nine of the states reviewed: Arizona, Arkansas, Indiana, Maryland, Montana, South Dakota, Virginia, Washington, and West Virginia. Note those absent from this list.

After a decade of trying for voluntary adoption, the Jockey Club is supporting the Horseracing Integrity Act of 2017 (H.R. 2651).
When enacted, H.R. 2651 would provide the horse racing industry with a single set of uniform drug testing rules and enforcement protocols that would be managed by an independent, non-governmental, not-for-profit anti-doping organization.

Horseracing may not have too many more decades to spare. There are too many people who care more about these horses than they care about wagering or who gets the biggest trophies and eclipse awards.

Passing this act might be a good place to start, but I’m no longer convinced that this alone will solve the many issues facing racing. It looks to me now that it will take a National Commission Office to enforce consistency and uniformity on issues other than medication use, like aftercare and the financial structure of the sport, and to successfully market it. I seriously doubt we’ll make horse racing popular again if we don’t make some drastic changes very soon. And we will keep losing participants - owners, trainers, breeders, fans and the wagering public - until it's no longer sustainable.
User avatar
Sparrow Castle
 
Posts: 3735
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:44 pm

Re: Jockey/Trainer News - 2017

Postby BaroqueAgain1 » Mon Jan 01, 2018 10:44 pm

That is a very well-written and thought-out essay, Sparrow Castle.
Thank you. ;)
BaroqueAgain1
 
Posts: 8275
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:16 pm

Re: Jockey/Trainer News - 2017

Postby Sparrow Castle » Mon Jan 01, 2018 11:25 pm

Thanks, BaroqueAgain, it took a little longer than I usually spend here to write it all out.

And then there's this kind of trainer...

Carly@ballydolphin
44m44 minutes ago
There is no good enough caption for this.
"Help get me back to the winners circle" lol
Help Maria Borell prove her innocence in Kentucky
https://www.fundedjustice.com/a1JQX4?ref=fb_f73R21_ab_6UN0QcaJCje6UN0QcaJCje

Carly@ballydolphin
23m23 minutes ago
Replying to @BH_JBalan @flysofree
She posted it on her fb
Image
User avatar
Sparrow Castle
 
Posts: 3735
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:44 pm

Re: Jockey/Trainer News - 2017

Postby BaroqueAgain1 » Tue Jan 02, 2018 12:07 am

Uhhhh.... :shock:
BaroqueAgain1
 
Posts: 8275
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:16 pm

Re: Jockey/Trainer News - 2017

Postby Sparrow Castle » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:47 am

My goodness. I could have saved a lot of time if I had seen this earlier. Thank you, Elizabeth. I totally believe and agree with you. We need to change this!

Emily Shields Retweeted
Elizabeth Talamo @ElizabethTalamo
4h4 hours ago
Image
Image
User avatar
Sparrow Castle
 
Posts: 3735
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:44 pm

Re: Jockey/Trainer News - 2017

Postby BaroqueAgain1 » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:14 pm

Thank you for posting Elizabeth's account of this incident...and its outcome, which IMHO is unjust. :(
I hope that clients return to Ron in droves when his 60 days is up.
BaroqueAgain1
 
Posts: 8275
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:16 pm

Re: Jockey/Trainer News - 2017

Postby Starine » Tue Jan 02, 2018 8:35 pm

I'd like to comment on the Ellis thing, but I still can't get over Maria Borell's post. :x
User avatar
Starine
 
Posts: 3543
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2014 12:39 am
Location: South Carolina

Re: Jockey/Trainer News - 2017

Postby Somnambulist » Tue Jan 02, 2018 8:58 pm

Starine wrote:I'd like to comment on the Ellis thing, but I still can't get over Maria Borell's post. :x


Remember when everyone hear thought she was innocent? I do.

As for Ellis, racing enjoys making an example of one person and ignoring tons more. It's pathetic.
"Life's no piece of cake, mind you, but the recipe's my own to fool with."
User avatar
Somnambulist
 
Posts: 7032
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:59 pm

Re: Jockey/Trainer News - 2017

Postby Sparrow Castle » Tue Jan 02, 2018 9:14 pm

Starine wrote:I'd like to comment on the Ellis thing, but I still can't get over Maria Borell's post. :x

I just checked in on her "FundedJustice" page, and there's still only the initial $20 donation after 26 hours...and a lot of comments.
User avatar
Sparrow Castle
 
Posts: 3735
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:44 pm

Re: Jockey/Trainer News - 2017

Postby BaroqueAgain1 » Tue Jan 02, 2018 9:34 pm

Remember when everyone hear thought she was innocent? I do.

And when everyone thought Mattress Mack was a bad guy for letting her go right after the BC win? Time has sure brought a change of perspective there. :o
Mack has been generous, both to the hurricane victims in Houston and the workers devastated by the SLR fire. Between opening his Houston stores to anyone who needed to take shelter and sleep there, and the hundreds (IIRC) of mattresses he shipped to Del Mar, the man should get a special Eclipse Award for service to his communities.
BaroqueAgain1
 
Posts: 8275
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:16 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Racing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests